25 thoughts on “Shane Warne vs Michael Clarke – awesome contest, Clarke is clueless!

  1. blimey that some throw in …from deep point …nice

  2. @Charaker not only do you know nothing about cricket (mentioning Narine and
    Ashwin in the same Breathe as Warne and Murali, what a joke) you also have
    some listening deficiencies. Benaut said greatest leg spinner the world
    seen. None of those guys you mentioned are leggies. Second Narine, Ashwin
    and Ajmal aren’t in the same atmosphere as murali and Warne. Ajmal is
    pretty good but he struggles outside the subcontinent. Warne is better than
    Murali too since Warne bowled far less overs and played with class fast
    bowlers (one of the best if not the best ever in McGrath) taking wickets
    off him whereas Sri Lanka pretty much relied on Murali to take the bulk of
    their wickets for a decade. Also most of his wickets are against teams like
    Bangladesh whereas Warnies are from all comers.

  3. Hey robelinda do you have a ball by ball spell of warne in tha Sydney test
    against South Africa in 1997/98. They say he bowled his finest spell in
    that test. Asking as a favour

  4. @ Charaka Never, ever use the the names Ashwin and Warne in the same
    sentence. That’s like saying Mcgrath is a better batsman than Sachin.

  5. lol Clarke almost runs out Katich. Didnt Katich get dropped for him in 2004
    and than again when he became captain?

  6. clarke is clueless lmao WTF did the person that load this even watch it? i
    think your a retardddddd

  7. Charaka Jayarathne
    First off he says the best “leg spinner” the world has ever seen and all
    of the players you named are off spinners and by Ahwin I assume you mean
    Ashwin.
    Secondly name me a leg spinner better than Shane Warne.

  8. When did Clarke open for NSW? Gotta be around about 2005 or so, right? I’m
    guessing, don’t hate on me.

  9. The ball was hit by Clarke, so the ball is in play. But yeh you’re correct
    with the ruling, but that only applies if the ball goes through untouched
    by the bat or the batsman. I actually don’t know if it would count as a run
    out or a stumping?

  10. I see what you’re getting at, but it would be out, because the ball had
    come in contact with the batsman prior to him attempting the stumping (I
    think it would be considered a run out in this case).

Comments are closed.